For Media & Event Planners

The net impact of the scientific proof offered by Michael A Corey's The God Hypothesis can be likened to the hypothetical discovery of God's very own being by the Hubble Telescope. If this were to ever actually happen, it would clearly be the single most newsworthy item ever presented by the media! But The God Hypothesis does essentially the same thing, since it makes use of the latest scientific instrumentation (including the Hubble Telescope) to provide direct, incontrovertible evidence of a "Supercalculating Intellect" at work in the universe.

The pioneering cosmologist George Smoot echoed this very same sentiment when he discovered the cosmic "ripples" that essentially proved the modern Big Bang theory. "To those who are open to it," he said, "It's like looking at God."

And indeed it is! Another astrophysicist, a former atheist named Sir Fred Hoyle, was so overwhelmed by the nature of this scientific evidence that he went so far as to assert the following: "I do not believe that any scientist who examined the evidence would fail to draw the conclusion that the laws of nuclear physics have been deliberately designed... A commonsense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature."

This quote is all the more remarkable because it comes from a former atheist! It really is "like looking at God" when we use the "Goldilocks Principle" to examine the latest scientific findings regarding the universe in which we live. A commonsense interpretation of the facts INDEED suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature.

The God Hypothesis offers the first formal scientific proof for the existence of a Creator, based entirely on the latest cosmological evidence regarding the Big Bang and the remainder of cosmic evolution. The net impact of this scientific proof can be likened to the hypothetical discovery of God's very own being by the Hubble Telescope. If this were to ever actually happen, it would clearly be the single most newsworthy item ever presented by the media! But The God Hypothesis does essentially the same thing, since it makes use of the latest scientific instrumentation (including the Hubble Telescope) to provide direct, incontrovertible evidence of a "Supercalculating Intellect" at work in the universe.

The God Hypothesis uses the figure of Goldilocks to illustrate the important scientific principle that everything in the universe is "just right" for the existence of life. This is no small matter, because this "just right" status required that all of our world's building blocks be "fine-tuned" to a superhuman degree of accuracy. Even atheistic scientists readily admit that this fact provides overwhelming evidence for the existence of a "Supercalculating Intellect" at work in the universe.

The God Hypothesis eliminates the ongoing controversy between science and religion—and hence between creation and evolution—by showing
how both sides are saying the exact same thing in different words. This entirely debunks the popular belief that modern science has somehow
disproven the existence of a Creator.

The God Hypothesis provides the first scientifically-based interpretation of what the nature and character of God Himself is actually like. This is a
direct response to one of the research goals specified by the billionaire Sir John Templeton. Mr. Templeton wants to know if science alone has
anything at all to say about the underlying character of God, and The God Hypothesis answers this question with a resounding "Yes!" in a chapter entitled "Modern Science and the Nature of God." The good news is that the latest scientific findings entirely support the God of traditional theism, and this, in turn, should greatly please Jews, Christians, and Moslems alike.

The God Hypothesis offers the first detailed proposal for the reinclusion of God within certain aspects of the modern scientific method. This proposal allows God to be returned to the scientific domain without any compromise in the scientific process itself taking place.